Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary Wildfire's avatar

I read one of the pieces cited in this one...but there are a few important things overlooked in all this cheer. First, the notion that ramped-up renewables is good for the climate is false--producing, transporting and deploying those windmill and solar arrays takes a great deal of fossil fuel energy and hence emissions. Such deployment only leads to reduced emissions if the renewable power is REPLACING fossil fuels--so far that is not the case, it is just added on. We're using more fossil fuel energy than ever, and exporting a great deal.

Secondly, the IRA is full of handouts to the fossil fuel industries, such as the one I'm fighting now, one of seven hydrogen hubs--boondoggles in which taxpayers funds, in combination with private investment likely to never materialize, pays for highly dubious schemes to produce and use hydrogen. Nuclear power is also being promoted. If Congress does cut parts of the IRA, isn't it likely that they'll chop out the good parts, subsidies for efficiency and solar and heat pumps, while leaving the drilling mandates and subsidies in place?

Thirdly, even if the efficiency of and deployment of wind and solar were still ramping up--not sure that's the case--and the cost going down, there's a limit to how much can be used without storage capability. I understand batteries have also gotten cheaper and more efficient, but this is the crux of the question of how much progress can be expected.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts