Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gwyllm Llwydd's avatar

Thanks, that was a wonderful read. Having made my living as an artist, musician, etc. I know that place of no retirement. Best of luck, and please keep writing.

Gwyllm

Expand full comment
Toby Thaler's avatar

Thanks for your questions. Some responses:

• In my actions I am focused on resilience and equity.

• My position on housing is consistent: We need more housing for low income people, not more market rate housing. At the City Council I am also working on urban forestry. Hopefully we can significantly improve Seattle's management of that resource. It’s been pretty appalling.

• Speaking to your larger questions, growth and density etc. I disagree with your assumption that dense = lower GHC across the board. There is a lot of work showing that wealth is at least as important; the more money, the more GHGs—flygskam! I am convinced that lots of the energy problem will take care of itself as systems collapse to support our stupid and glutinous level of consumption. Apology for repeat, but for this point, please read Ivan Illich's short book "Energy and Equity." "Socialism can only be reached by bicycle."

• Suburbs are not inherently high GHG; that's only because of the poor way we allocate allowances for moving people and goods around.

• I am agnostic on the size of cities and how people distribute themselves that will work best. I am not agnostic on models that cause gentrification and displacement; I reject them as bad policy.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts