3 Comments
User's avatar
Mark Vossler's avatar

Great article. Even if we give the nuclear energy proponents the benefit of the doubt that they can solve the problems of waste and weapons (a big if) they time frame of getting SMRs functionally on line by late 2020s is too long to solve the climate crisis.

Nancy M's avatar

This is a most excellent article. As a resident of WA state in the late 1970's, I watched the debacle of WPPSS, the Washington Public Power Supply System (“Whoops!”) in its beginning and the horrendous mess it created. Frightening is that nuclear power plants would have been built on very active earthquake fault lines which no one considered at that time.

Dave Hall's avatar

This seems to be an excellent summary of the issues with nuclear power. I plan to subscribe to The Raven especially for your review of TerraPower which addresses some of the cost issues of scale for the SMRs. Longterm waste is already a problem and may well benefit in its own right from developing burner reactors that use up the actinides and shorten longterm storage.

I would like to see the cost estimates and critical evaluation of the disseminated electrical grid, storage costs for excess electricity production with wind and solar, and environmental costs of battery mining, manufacturing and recycling.